U.S. attorney in Georgia: ‘There’s just nothing to’ claims of election fraud

On the decision, Bobby Christine, who additionally serves as the highest federal prosecutor in the Southern District of Georgia, advised that he was stunned to be taught the workplace had not discovered vital election fraud points.

“Quite frankly, just watching television, you would assume that you got election cases stacked from the floor to the ceiling,” Christine stated, based on the Atlanta newspaper. “I am so happy to find out that’s not the case, but I didn’t know coming in.”

A spokesman for Christine’s workplace declined to remark Tuesday.

The Washington Post reported final week that Christine introduced with him from the Southern District two prosecutors, Joshua S. Bearden and Jason Blanchard, who beforehand had been assigned to research election fraud issues. He additionally introduced in former federal prosecutor Matt Hart, a lawyer in Birmingham, Ala., who beforehand dealt with public corruption circumstances, on a contract foundation, folks acquainted with the matter instructed The Post.

The additions unnerved present and former officers in each the Southern and Northern districts of Georgia, notably in gentle of the abrupt resignation of Christine’s predecessor, Byung J. “BJay” Pak.

“Mr. Pak’s forced resignation against the backdrop of White House insistence to prosecute purported election offenses is then followed by the curious appointment of an outsider who immediately brings in election prosecutors from outside the district — it all gives rise to a ready inference that the newcomers are willing to pursue what was troubling enough to cause Mr. Pak to resign,” stated John Horn, a former U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia.

Christine stated on the decision with the Northern District employees that he introduced the 2 election fraud prosecutors to sort out what he anticipated could be a “dump truck full” of election information. Instead, he discovered “very, very few” and dismissed two circumstances on his first day in workplace.

“We don’t have these huge colossal issues that if you turn on the TV, you’d think it’d be,” he stated.

A Justice Department official stated Tuesday that the 2 attorneys Christine introduced from the Southern District had returned to their house workplace.

Trump had been upset with what he perceived as a scarcity of Justice Department motion on his unfounded claims in Georgia and throughout the nation, based on folks acquainted with the matter, who spoke on the situation of anonymity to described the president’s views.

Precisely how that performed into Pak’s resignation was unclear, however two folks acquainted with the matter stated he acquired a name from the Office of Deputy Attorney General, run by Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Richard P. Donoghue, that led him to imagine he ought to resign.

The Justice Department has declined to touch upon Pak’s departure.

His exit got here just a day after The Post reported on an name in which Trump urged Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” sufficient votes to overturn Trump’s election defeat in the state. In the identical dialog, Trump cited a “never-Trumper U.S. attorney” in Georgia — a attainable reference to Pak — and hinted vaguely and baselessly that Raffensperger’s refusal to behave on his unfounded fraud claims constituted a “criminal offense.”

In saying his departure, Pak launched an announcement saying that he did “my best to be thoughtful and consistent, and to provide justice for my fellow citizens in a fair, effective and efficient manner.” He has declined to remark additional.

Christine was then instantly put in in the submit by Trump — bypassing Kurt Erskine, a longtime federal prosecutor who had been Pak’s high deputy and would have in any other case assumed the position.

Officials with the workplace of the Georgia secretary of state have been saying for weeks that President-elect Joe Biden’s slim victory in Georgia was free, truthful and untainted by widespread fraud.

In his Jan. 2 name with Trump, Raffensperger rejected the president’s entreaties to “find the votes” to overturn the outcomes in the state and insisted his assertions about fraud have been unsuitable.

“This is what we’ve been saying all along,” Gabriel Sterling, a high Raffensperger aide, stated Tuesday after the Christine name leaked. “The facts are the facts. The evidence is the evidence. It has clearly shown through multiple law enforcement agencies at the state and federal level that there is simply not enough evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the election.”

Source link
#attorney #Georgia #claims #election #fraud

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *